[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-accessibility
Subject:    Re: [Kde-accessibility] An accessible Qt? I think not.
From:       Leo Spalteholz <leo.spalteholz () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-11-16 18:38:21
Message-ID: 7c98fd570511161038o1ac4fc59hfeff4280d7361a2b () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/16/05, Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@sun.com> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Word on MSAA's lifespan seems to go back and forth.  I wouldn't be surprised
> if things written to MSAA get exposed in UI Automation with a "connector" (or
> whatever is their current terminology for a bridge).  Nontheless, Microsoft
> clearly sees it as an insufficient interface as well, which is why they are
> going with UI Automation.  Also an insufficiently extensible interface (which
> is why this isn't simply an up-rev of MSAA).

Microsoft says that MSAA will be supported for the lifetime of Vista,
and UI Automation will be supported in Windows XP as well as Vista. 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnacc/html/ui_automation_over.asp

Leo
_______________________________________________
kde-accessibility mailing list
kde-accessibility@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-accessibility
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]