1. 2000-02-27 [23] Re: disadvantages of Artistic license ? kde-licensi mosfet 2. 2000-02-22 [5] Object code vs source code kde-licensi Raul Miller 3. 2000-02-22 [15] Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyr kde-licensi Raul Miller 4. 2000-02-22 [12] Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright kde-licensi Andreas Pour 5. 2000-02-18 [31] Heart of the debate kde-licensi Don Sanders 6. 2000-02-17 [41] Re: KDE not in Debian? kde-licensi Thomas Bushnell, 7. 2000-02-17 [5] Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate kde-licensi Raul Miller 8. 2000-02-16 [1] Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate kde-licensi Don Sanders 9. 2000-02-15 [72] On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?) kde-licensi Raul Miller 10. 2000-02-15 [40] Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretatio kde-licensi Raul Miller 11. 2000-02-07 [7] Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious lib kde-licensi Raul Miller 12. 2000-02-07 [1] Thank you Andreas Pour kde-licensi Don Sanders 13. 2000-02-04 [2] Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?) kde-licensi Raul Miller 14. 2000-02-02 [2] Fixing the KDE legal issues kde-licensi Joseph Carter 15. 2000-02-01 [1] Re: Double Standard? kde-licensi Chris Lawrence 16. 2000-02-01 [2] Re: Was Re: KDE not in Debian? kde-licensi Raul Miller