Search: 
[] List [] Subjects [] Authors [] Bodies for list 'sip-implementors'
Set Page Width: [ 80 ] [ 90 ] [ 100 ] [ 120 ]
Viewing messages in list sip-implementors
- 2008-09-01 - 2008-10-01 (353 messages)
- 2008-08-01 - 2008-09-01 (302 messages)
- 2008-07-01 - 2008-08-01 (274 messages)
 Next  Last 

  1. 2008-08-31  [3] [Sip-implementors] Something as "Resource" in XMPP fo sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
  2. 2008-08-31  [1] [Sip-implementors] Prohibit forwarding INVITE and non sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
  3. 2008-08-31  [3] [Sip-implementors] SIP end points behind firewall/NAT sip-imple Valentin Nech
  4. 2008-08-29  [1] [Sip-implementors] BRI-SIP gateways and standards     sip-imple Hearty, John 
  5. 2008-08-28  [5] [Sip-implementors] Something as "P-E.164" header?     sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas
  6. 2008-08-28  [4] [Sip-implementors] Via and record-route               sip-imple Dale.Worley
  7. 2008-08-28  [4] [Sip-implementors] [BNF] 'absolute URI' and URI/heade sip-imple Dale.Worley
  8. 2008-08-27  [5] Re: [Sip-implementors] 18x with tag                   sip-imple Manoj Kumar 
  9. 2008-08-26  [2] [Sip-implementors] Doesn't PRACK break CSeq order whe sip-imple Attila Sipos 
 10. 2008-08-26  [5] [Sip-implementors] Multiple Authentication-Info heade sip-imple Attila Sipos 
 11. 2008-08-25  [4] [Sip-implementors] "From" allowing more URI's than "s sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas
 12. 2008-08-25  [8] [Sip-implementors] Bug in RFC3966 (tel URI) BNF       sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas
 13. 2008-08-25  [7] [Sip-implementors] Conflict between SIP related RFC's sip-imple Dale.Worley
 14. 2008-08-25  [4] [Sip-implementors] Switching to reliable transport to sip-imple Dale.Worley
 15. 2008-08-25  [3] [Sip-implementors] "tel" BNF and From BNF (URI vs hea sip-imple Dale.Worley
 16. 2008-08-24  [1] [Sip-implementors] Testing SIP over SCTP              sip-imple =?UTF-8?Q?Vic
 17. 2008-08-24  [2] [Sip-implementors] Use of direction "none" is desired sip-imple zhengyli
 18. 2008-08-23  [4] [Sip-implementors] Why "Route" allows non SIP/SIPS UR sip-imple Paul Kyzivat 
 19. 2008-08-22  [6] [Sip-implementors] Proxy replying with 300            sip-imple Dale.Worley
 20. 2008-08-22  [6] [Sip-implementors] "tel" URI utilities                sip-imple Dale.Worley
 21. 2008-08-22  [2] [Sip-implementors] Why ACK is separate transaction in sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas
 22. 2008-08-22 [14] [Sip-implementors] rfc3261 section 13.2.2.4: INVITE 2 sip-imple Dale.Worley
 23. 2008-08-22 [10] [Sip-implementors] Query regarding sending of symbol  sip-imple Scott Lawrenc
 24. 2008-08-22  [3] [Sip-implementors] Change of Allow header content wit sip-imple Paul Kyzivat 
 25. 2008-08-21  [1] [Sip-implementors] Reminder: SIPit 23 registration    sip-imple Robert Sparks
 26. 2008-08-21  [8] Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on B2BUA inserting metho sip-imple Nebojsa Milja
 27. 2008-08-21  [6] [Sip-implementors] which parameter is not allowed in  sip-imple Rajat Chandna
 28. 2008-08-21  [9] [Sip-implementors] Does proxy need cancel forked non- sip-imple zhengyli
 29. 2008-08-21  [3] [Sip-implementors] Usage of P-Asserted-Identity in re sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas
 30. 2008-08-21  [3] [Sip-implementors] Why 200 for CANCEL needs "To tag"  sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Cas

 Next  Last 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic