Search: 
[] List [] Subjects [] Authors [  ] Bodies (must pick a list first)
Set Page Width: [ 80 ] [ 90 ] [ 100 ] [ 120 ]
Viewing messages in thread 'Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols? (Re: It's official... DES is H'
Viewing messages in list cypherpunks
- 2024-06-01 - 2024-07-01 (213 messages) 
  1. 1999-06-29 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun William H. Geiger 
  2. 1999-06-29 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cryptogra Peter Gutmann
  3. 1999-06-29 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun Peter Gutmann
  4. 1999-06-29 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cryptogra Dan Geer 
  5. 1999-06-29 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun Dan Geer 
  6. 1999-06-28 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cryptogra Tom Weinstein 
  7. 1999-06-28 Re: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun Tom Weinstein 
  8. 1999-06-28 RE: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun James A. Donald 
  9. 1999-06-28 RE: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cryptogra Trei, Peter 
 10. 1999-06-28 RE: Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling addi  cypherpun Trei, Peter 
 11. 1999-06-27 Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling adding D  cryptogra Steve Mynott 
 12. 1999-06-27 Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF stilling adding D  cypherpun Steve Mynott

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic