1. 2012-05-25 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Colin Hall 2. 2012-05-25 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Colin Hall 3. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Janek_WarchoĊ 4. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Phil Holmes 5. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Phil Holmes 6. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Graham Percival 7. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Nick Payne 8. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Urs Liska 9. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Nick Payne 10. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- mike 11. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Urs Liska 12. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Toine Schreurs 13. 2012-05-24 Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Toine Schreurs 14. 2012-05-24 Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Nick Payne 15. 2012-05-24 Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 lilypond- Nick Payne