postfix-users

2024-06-01 - 2024-07-01 (13 messages)

  1. 2024-05-02 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
  2. 2024-05-02 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
  3. 2024-02-01 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
  4. 2024-02-01 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Claus Assmann via 
  5. 2024-02-01 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
  6. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
  7. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
  8. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
  9. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
 10. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
 11. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
 12. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Viktor Dukhovni vi
 13. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
 14. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Claus Assmann via 
 15. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v
 16. 2024-01-31 [pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?            postfix-u Wietse Venema via 
 17. 2024-01-31 [pfx] milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?                postfix-u Steffen Nurpmeso v