1. 2020-08-17 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 2. 2020-08-17 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h David Holmes 3. 2020-08-15 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 4. 2020-08-14 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h David Holmes 5. 2020-08-14 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h David Holmes 6. 2020-08-13 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 7. 2020-08-13 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h David Holmes 8. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Vladimir Kozlov 9. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 10. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 11. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Vladimir Kozlov 12. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Lois Foltan 13. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore 14. 2020-08-12 Re: RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be a openjdk-h Lois Foltan 15. 2020-08-12 RFR (S) 8235765: Use of the long type should be avoid openjdk-h Coleen Phillimore