1. 2021-12-19 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de David Smiley 2. 2021-12-19 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev David Smiley 3. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Gus Heck 4. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Gus Heck 5. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Gus Heck 6. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Gus Heck 7. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Jan_Høydahl 8. 2021-12-18 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Jan_Høydahl 9. 2021-12-15 RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Uwe Schindler 10. 2021-12-15 RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Uwe Schindler 11. 2021-12-15 RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Uwe Schindler 12. 2021-12-15 RE: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Uwe Schindler 13. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Gus Heck 14. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Gus Heck 15. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de solr 16. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev solr 17. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D solr-dev Mike Drob 18. 2021-12-14 Re: Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -D lucene-de Mike Drob 19. 2021-12-14 Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -Dlog4 solr-dev solr 20. 2021-12-14 Log4j < 2.15.0 may still be vulnerable even if -Dlog4 lucene-de solr