[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zebra
Subject:    [zebra 4546] RE: Full routing table
From:       "John Blagg" <jblagg () ak ! net>
Date:       2000-07-28 0:45:20
[Download RAW message or body]

I've got some with more than 2100 days of operation since last boot...

JohnB

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-zebra@dml.com [mailto:owner-zebra@dml.com]On Behalf Of Leigh
Porter
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 7:54 AM
To: zebra@dml.com
Subject: [zebra 4535] Re: Full routing table


Bertrand Maujean wrote:

Ciscos are reliable...?

--
Leigh


>
> Very interresting !
>
> What about the bandwidth of your links ? What kind of interfaces do you
have
> between your box and your upstreams/peers ? Do you think a Linux box is
> reliable enough to make a backbone router, compared to a real cisco ?
>
> Bertrand Maujean
>
> Sven =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6thig?= a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i´m using Zebra with 2 upstreams and 3 peers (with full tables).
> > there are ap. 86000 kernelroutes
> >
> > i´ve got some problem with ospf, it crashes after some days.
> > but bgp is running stable.
> >
> > hardware : celeron 500, 64 MB
> > software : Suse 6.4, kernel 2.2.16
> >
> > bgpd uses 22MB Ram
> > zebra uses 11MB Ram
> >
> > Bertrand Maujean schrieb:
> > >
> > > Hello !
> > >
> > > I'm new to Zebra.
> > > My company will need, within a few month, to connect several ISP. My
> > > concern is about dynamic routing. Is Zebra, especially on a Linux box,
> > > well-suited for doing dynamic routing ? Can this kind of config handle
> > > full routing tables from several ISP ? I dont want to purchase some
> > > expensive cisco products.
> > >
> > > Thanks you in advance !
> > >

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]