[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlbeans-dev
Subject:    RE: Serializability
From:       "Allman, Michael" <Michael.Allman () ssa ! gov>
Date:       2004-01-20 21:43:27
Message-ID: A7D8437865D2F44489538FF5A8D41FF90298C2D0 () s25fcd0 ! ba ! ssa ! gov
[Download RAW message or body]

One reason to consider making XmlObject itself extend Serializable is to
simplify interaction with APIs such as JMS which use the Serializable
interface in methods where only serializable objects are to be used (e.g.
javax.jms.ObjectMessage).

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bau [mailto:david.bau@bea.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:31 PM
> To: xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Serializability
> 
> 
> > Can we make this a part of the XMLBeans API contract?  E.g., can we 
> > put a note in the JavaDoc for XmlObject and its subinterfaces that 
> > "XMLBeans-produced implementations of this interface are 
> guaranteed to 
> > be serializable"?
> 
> I like that idea.  What do others here think?
> 
> David
> 
> - 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org Apache XMLBeans Project -- 
> URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/
> 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Apache XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]