[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: wine-devel
Subject: Re: Making SetThreadPriorityBoost claim success
From: Daniel_Jeliński <djelinski1 () gmail ! com>
Date: 2013-05-27 13:55:28
Message-ID: CAMrH03LtzZMwWp1c7JQF4dv=yd2BcddSvpL1iJ9MSKYoMNxkkQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
I guess the only way to find out is sending a patch to wine-patches. It
would probably be acceptable, SetThreadStackGuarantee also returns true
while doing nothing.
By the way, this page might be more related to the function in question:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566
(search for 'boost')
Regards,
Daniel
2013/5/26 Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup.
>
> How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just
> return success, as in the patch attached to
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1
>
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw
>
> ? We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE.
>
> Related if catty discussion:
> http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html
>
>
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr">I guess the only way to find out is sending a patch to wine-patches. \
It would probably be acceptable, SetThreadStackGuarantee also returns true while \
doing nothing.<div>By the way, this page might be more related to the function in \
question:</div> <div><a \
href="http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566">http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566</a></div><div>(search \
for 'boost')</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Daniel</div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/5/26 Dan Kegel <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dank@kegel.com" \
target="_blank">dank@kegel.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <a \
href="http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280" \
target="_blank">http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280</a> just got another \
dup.<br> <br>
How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just<br>
return success, as in the patch attached to<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1" \
target="_blank">http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1</a><br> <br>
<a href="http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw" \
target="_blank">http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw</a><br>
<br>
? We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE.<br>
<br>
Related if catty discussion:<br>
<a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html" \
target="_blank">http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic