[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] msxml3/tests: Fix the domdoc IObjectSafety tests for
From:       Reece Dunn <msclrhd () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2010-02-28 21:37:24
Message-ID: 3f4fd2641002281337j2f0ce247t62ae2844b142711c () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 28 February 2010 19:11, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 11:07 PM, Reece Dunn wrote:
>>
>> +    todo_wine
>> +    ok(broken(supported == (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER |
>> INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA)) ||
>> +       supported == (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER |
>> INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA | INTERFACE_USES_SECURITY_MANAGER) /*
>> msxml3 SP8+ */,
>> +        "Expected (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER |
>> INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA) "
>> +        "or (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER |
>> INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA | INTERFACE_USES_SECURITY_MANAGER), "
>
> Hi Reece,
>
> We usually don't add the broken() possibility as one of the expected
> outcomes in the ok-message.

I have applied your comment to the tests I have been working on and
submitting that as the fix for the failing tests, as I have reworked
the tests to extend the coverage.

Thanks,
- Reece



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]