[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       wine-devel
Subject:    Re: [TRY 4] user32/tests: Add tests for STM_SETIMAGE and
From:       "Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry () codeweavers ! com>
Date:       2009-09-29 6:57:45
Message-ID: 276DDEBB032E4DE1BB2DADC68EEF028A () DMITRY
[Download RAW message or body]

"Ilya Shpigor" <shpigor@etersoft.ru> wrote:

> +    flush_sequence();
> +    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_BITMAP, (LPARAM)hbm);
> +    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", FALSE);
> +
> +    flush_sequence();
> +    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ICON, (LPARAM)hicon);
> +    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", FALSE);
> +
> +    flush_sequence();
> +    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETICON, (WPARAM)hicon, 0);
> +    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetIconErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETICON on a static", FALSE);
> +
> +    flush_sequence();
> +    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ENHMETAFILE, (LPARAM)hemf);
> +    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", FALSE);

You should use SendMessageA instead of SendMessageW to make the test run
under Win9x as well. Testing the return value of SendMessage would be also
helpful.

-- 
Dmitry.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]