[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: webkit-dev
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Standing of the WINCE port
From: KwangYul Seo <kwangyul.seo () gmail ! com>
Date: 2009-08-27 16:53:20
Message-ID: 7beb12420908270953r14d4310ft6a797d0c9a4bf5a5 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Hi,
2 WINCE ports are not competing. We are waiting for Torch Mobile to finish
the WINCE port not to cause conflicts as you can see in:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27076
I submitted the Geolocation WINCE patch because the Torch Mobile WINCE port
does not have one:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095
The problem was not the review process but the license problem because we
started the closed beta program without opening our soure code. Recently we
released the open source portion of our browser source code and the source
tarballs are available from our web site.
We hope that we can contribute our code where there is no direct conflict
with the on-going Torch Mobile's WINCE port. Because we do share much of
Torch Mobile's code, I think two ports are not really competiting.
Regards,
Kwang Yul Seo
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Eric Seidel <eric@webkit.org> wrote:
> I didn't realize there were 2 competing WINCE ports??
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Adam Barth <abarth@webkit.org> wrote:
>
>> In trying to help out with the review queue, I noticed this comment:
>>
>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16
>>
>> [[
>> Comment #16 From George Staikos 2009-08-26 09:17:28 PDT (-) [reply]
>> In case you still don't understand, the reason your patch hasn't got r+ so
>> far
>> is because your company is openly and willfully violating the WebKit
>> license
>> and some copyrights. This is not welcome, and I don't think WebKit wants
>> contributions of any sort from those who are violating the license.
>> ]]
>>
>> Is the WINCE port in a bad standing of some sort, or can reviews of
>> WINCE patches proceed as normal?
>>
>> Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
Hi,<br><br>2 WINCE ports are not competing. We are waiting for Torch Mobile to finish \
the WINCE port not to cause conflicts as you can see in:<br><br><a \
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27076">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27076</a><br>
<br><br>I submitted the Geolocation WINCE patch because the Torch Mobile WINCE port \
does not have one:<br><br><a \
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095</a><br><br>
<br>The problem was not the review process but the license problem because we \
started the closed beta program without opening our soure code. Recently we released \
the open source portion of our browser source code and the source tarballs are \
available from our web site.<br> <br>We hope that we can contribute our code where \
there is no direct conflict with the on-going Torch Mobile's WINCE port. Because \
we do share much of Torch Mobile's code, I think two ports are not really \
competiting.<br> <br>Regards,<br>Kwang Yul Seo<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On \
Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Eric Seidel <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:eric@webkit.org">eric@webkit.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I didn't realize there were 2 competing WINCE \
ports??<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug \
26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Adam Barth <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:abarth@webkit.org" target="_blank">abarth@webkit.org</a>></span> \
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); \
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">In trying to help out with the review \
queue, I noticed this comment:<br> <br>
<a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16" \
target="_blank">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16</a><br> <br>
[[<br>
Comment #16 From George Staikos 2009-08-26 09:17:28 PDT (-) [reply]<br>
In case you still don't understand, the reason your patch hasn't got r+ so \
far<br> is because your company is openly and willfully violating the WebKit \
license<br> and some copyrights. This is not welcome, and I don't think WebKit \
wants<br> contributions of any sort from those who are violating the license.<br>
]]<br>
<br>
Is the WINCE port in a bad standing of some sort, or can reviews of<br>
WINCE patches proceed as normal?<br>
<br>
Adam<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
webkit-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org" \
target="_blank">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br> <a \
href="http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev" \
target="_blank">http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev</a><br> \
</blockquote></div><br> \
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br> webkit-dev \
mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev" \
target="_blank">http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev</a><br> \
<br></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic