[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       webkit-dev
Subject:    Re: [webkit-dev] Standing of the WINCE port
From:       Eric Seidel <eric () webkit ! org>
Date:       2009-08-27 6:36:09
Message-ID: 1448d9f30908262336h6619597asc80ec637d6be28c3 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


I didn't realize there were 2 competing WINCE ports??

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Adam Barth <abarth@webkit.org> wrote:

> In trying to help out with the review queue, I noticed this comment:
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16
>
> [[
>  Comment #16 From George Staikos 2009-08-26 09:17:28 PDT (-) [reply]
> In case you still don't understand, the reason your patch hasn't got r+ so
> far
> is because your company is openly and willfully violating the WebKit
> license
> and some copyrights.  This is not welcome, and I don't think WebKit wants
> contributions of any sort from those who are violating the license.
> ]]
>
> Is the WINCE port in a bad standing of some sort, or can reviews of
> WINCE patches proceed as normal?
>
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

I didn&#39;t realize there were 2 competing WINCE ports??<br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Adam Barth <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:abarth@webkit.org">abarth@webkit.org</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">In trying to help out with the review queue, I noticed \
this comment:<br> <br>
<a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16" \
target="_blank">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c16</a><br> <br>
[[<br>
 Comment #16 From George Staikos 2009-08-26 09:17:28 PDT (-) [reply]<br>
In case you still don&#39;t understand, the reason your patch hasn&#39;t got r+ so \
far<br> is because your company is openly and willfully violating the WebKit \
license<br> and some copyrights.  This is not welcome, and I don&#39;t think WebKit \
wants<br> contributions of any sort from those who are violating the license.<br>
]]<br>
<br>
Is the WINCE port in a bad standing of some sort, or can reviews of<br>
WINCE patches proceed as normal?<br>
<br>
Adam<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
webkit-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev" \
target="_blank">http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev</a><br> \
</blockquote></div><br>



_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]