[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: veritas-bu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Incremental backup using time-stamp
From: "Martin, Jonathan" <JMARTI05 () intersil ! com>
Date: 2007-07-30 12:54:29
Message-ID: 13E204E614D8E04FAF594C9AA9ED0BB708AACD6A () PBCOMX02 ! intersil ! corp
[Download RAW message or body]
--===============2096732473==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7D2A8.C45D51EB"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
We did Time Stamp Windows Backups here on 5.1 MP4. It worked fine as
far as I can tell. Just make sure you full and diff schedules are in
the same policy or Netbackup gets all confused.
-J
________________________________
From: veritas-bu-bounces@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Rolf C
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 6:34 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Incremental backup using time-stamp
Hello all,
Does anyone have experience with making an incremental backup using a
time-stamp instead of the archive bit?
We would like to make an incremental backup of a splitted BCV. As far as
i know the only way to do this is with a time-stamp. (after
resynchronisation of the BCV the archive bit's are cleared and an
incremental backup would result in another full backup)
We're using NetBackup 6.0MP4 on Windows.
Any comment is appriciated!
Rolf
________________________________
PC Magazine's 2007 editors' choice for best web mail-award-winning
Windows Live Hotmail. Check it out!
<http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_mig
ration_HMWL_mini_pcmag_0707>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<STYLE>P {
PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; \
PADDING-TOP: 0px }
BODY {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=664355312-30072007>We did Time Stamp Windows
Backups here on 5.1 MP4. It worked fine as far as I can tell. Just
make sure you full and diff schedules are in the same policy or Netbackup gets
all confused.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=664355312-30072007></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=664355312-30072007>-J</SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<B>From:</B> veritas-bu-bounces@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Rolf
C<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, July 28, 2007 6:34 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Veritas-bu] Incremental
backup using time-stamp<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hello all,<BR> <BR>Does anyone have experience with making an
incremental backup using a time-stamp instead of the archive
bit?<BR> <BR>We would like to make an incremental backup of a splitted BCV.
As far as i know the only way to do this is with a time-stamp. (after
resynchronisation of the BCV the archive bit's are cleared and an incremental
backup would result in another full backup)<BR> <BR>We're using NetBackup
6.0MP4 on Windows.<BR> <BR>Any comment is
appriciated!<BR> <BR>Rolf<BR><BR>
<HR>
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best web mail—award-winning \
Windows Live Hotmail. <A
href="http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HMWL_mini_pcmag_0707" \
target=_new>Check it out!</A> </BODY></HTML>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--===============2096732473==--
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic