[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       varnish-commit
Subject:    Re: [master] d6d341609 Revert "actually, the scope must not change either"
From:       Nils Goroll <nils.goroll () uplex ! de>
Date:       2019-05-27 8:22:30
Message-ID: a41ecac2-d26b-aba8-c94d-de3b6d0ea851 () uplex ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]

[Attachment #4 (multipart/mixed)]


> You should also thank Martin without whom I would have remained on the
> wrong track probably until today's bugwash.

Thank you, Martin! And I apologize for my bug.

>> I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to give PRIV_TOP its own tree head
>> rather than an additional id to put into a shared tree?
> 
> I have no opinion (but I understand the rationale) so I will leave
> this question to the rest of the team.

Using a different head would use less memory, be more CPU efficient and also, I
think, result in simpler code. So a clear cut case in my opinion.

Nils

-- 

** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung

Scheffelstraße 32
22301 Hamburg

tel +49 40 28805731
mob +49 170 2723133
fax +49 40 42949753

xmpp://slink@jabber.int.uplex.de/

http://uplex.de/


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
varnish-commit mailing list
varnish-commit@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-commit


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]