[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       varnish-commit
Subject:    Re: [master] d6d341609 Revert "actually, the scope must not change either"
From:       Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi () varni ! sh>
Date:       2019-05-27 7:18:18
Message-ID: CABoVN9ASXhrE478=F1UbCF1rWkk7nBFSXNYrjEknky0maN=GQw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Nils,

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:00 PM Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Dridi,
>
> thank you for looking after this.

You should also thank Martin without whom I would have remained on the
wrong track probably until today's bugwash.

> I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to give PRIV_TOP its own tree head
> rather than an additional id to put into a shared tree?

I have no opinion (but I understand the rationale) so I will leave
this question to the rest of the team.

Dridi
_______________________________________________
varnish-commit mailing list
varnish-commit@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-commit
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]