[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: uclibc
Subject: gcc version for kernel compilation
From: ori () helicontech ! co ! il (Ori Idan)
Date: 2005-12-18 5:36:27
Message-ID: 43A56615.4030503 () helicontech ! co ! il
[Download RAW message or body]
Rob Landley wrote:
>On Friday 16 December 2005 03:56, Will Newton wrote:
>
>
>>On 12/16/05, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Some days ago, 2.95.x was somewhat abondoned, so new features _only_
>>>supported by newer GCC versions are okay to use right now, without
>>>checking.
>>>
>>>
>>Is this an official position of the uClibc project? I am still using
>>gcc 2.95.2 with no problems BTW.
>>
>>
>
>No, it's a linux-kernel issue. Covered here:
>http://kerneltrap.org/node/5974
>
>Rob
>
>
I thought it is a linux-kernel issue, I asked this question here as I
thought I would get inputs from people using GCC 3.x for kernel compilation.
I recall that in kernel 2.4 it was advised to use GCC 2.95.x (x > 3) for
kernel compilation.
--
Ori Idan
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic