[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tigervnc-devel
Subject:    Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [patch] Add support for xorg 1.7.x
From:       Adam Tkac <atkac () redhat ! com>
Date:       2009-12-17 15:57:31
Message-ID: 20091217155731.GA3560 () evileye ! atkac ! englab ! brq ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:52:04AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > Hi, the attached two patches (against tigervnc 1.0.0) are my first
> > working version of this.
> > 
> > I'm building against 1.7.3.901 under gentoo. So far I've only had the
> > time to test Xvnc itself, but it seems to be ok so far...
> 
> I found my port to 1.7 was simplified by first taking the patch from
> the upstream svn to replace the XORG_16 style defines with the XORG
> define so that the existing checks became "#if XORG >= 16"
> 
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/x-cons/XW_NV_tw-clone/open-src/xserver/xvnc/upstream-xorg-version.patch
>  is the copy I use in my builds.

Yes, this is the main reason why we started to use XORG <number>
instead of XORG_<number>.

The "X.Org 1.7" patch is really welcomed. I will look on it and merge
it to the main repo.

Regards, Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]