[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       taglib-devel
Subject:    Re: TagLib's future
From:       Festus Hagen <festushagenlists () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2015-06-25 17:19:34
Message-ID: 1489303247.1257101.1435252774021.JavaMail.yahoo () mail ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

It would be nice if the requester could assign predefined labels to their own pull \
requests ... I do like having only 'minor' and 'wishlist', no 'critical'.

Silence uint ambiguity errors in tests, Is my only pull request that should be in the \
next release, the rest are trivial wishlists items, the only one that could cause an \
issue is Append TIME to TDRC ..., I do not _know_ the big picture of affect, I'm not \
as fluent as most of y'all.


Thanks for doing what y'all do ...

-Enjoy
> )_~


----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Wheeler <wheeler@kde.org>
To: taglib-devel@kde.org
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: TagLib's future

On Jun 23, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Tsuda Kageyu <tsuda.kageyu@gmail.com> wrote:
> First, I agree with you it's good to freeze the changes at a certain point or just \
> now. Many people are awaiting the next release. 
> Certainly, I have been making a lot of pull requests that may delay the progress of \
> the project. However, I don't think they have to necessarily merged into the next \
> release. How about closing the non-urgent pull request for now? (Privately, I hope \
> "length in milliseconds" feature be merged.)

Yes, and for a little context, I told Lucas a few weeks back that I could help with \
the next release and began going through the open requests, getting through about \
half of the ones that were open at the time.  However, during the last few weeks \
there have been so many new requests opened (and many of them closed again) that I \
haven't had time to even read them, much less review them.  There have been 6 new \
pull requests and 39 messages just in the last 24 hours.

It would probably be good if new pull requests being opened that are not critical for \
the next release could be tagged that way.  I'd suggest (based on the old KDE bug \
tagging system) that they be either tagged as "minor" or "wishlist" for things that \
aren't actually critical.

-Scott

_______________________________________________
taglib-devel mailing list
taglib-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
_______________________________________________
taglib-devel mailing list
taglib-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]