[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       systalk
Subject:    [Systalk] mail service for dhs
From:       brent harding bharding () admin ! itol ! com
Date:       1999-10-31 16:16:25
[Download RAW message or body]

So, technically if companies allowed it, any level of domain would provide
the same functionality as the internic comains? Although you won't be able
to transfer easily because they would need the password, but putting in two
name servers isn't hard if you know what they are.
At 09:51 PM 10/30/99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>On 31-Oct-99 brent harding wrote:
>> How did whoever did everyone.net get it working with dhs? Or do
>> they not
>> care if you use subdomains? I know bigmailbox claims that you
>> can't control
>> mx in dhs.org, but I thought there's an mx box.
>> 
>
>They will give you every reason in the world why they don't allow
>it, but even if you prove them wrong, they will still stick to
>their policy.  It is just like Hypermart.  They do not see sites
>using those types of domains as being "serious" enough that they
>want to provide service to them is what it comes down to.
>
>Good luck trying to convince them otherwise.
>
>The fact is that a domain at the second level, third level, or
>forth level, or any level, is really exactly the same.  The only
>difference is that the chain of delegation is usually a little
>longer, and that has no real effect on the ability to use it for
>any function.
>
>--
>William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
>Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
>Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: systalk-unsubscribe@dhs.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: systalk-help@dhs.org
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]