[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sylpheed
Subject:    [sylpheed:27798] Re: About Sylpheed communauty
From:       Thomas Cataldo <thomas.cataldo () aliacom ! fr>
Date:       2006-03-31 15:45:29
Message-ID: 1143819929.5928.25.camel () chienne ! aliacom ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 18:32 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:00:15 +0200
> Thomas Cataldo <thomas.cataldo@aliacom.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Then I would like some answers to a few questions :
> >  - Are there other developpers with svn commit access ?
> 
> No, I'm the only one who has the svn commit access.
> 
> >  - How are contributions dealt with ?
> >  - Would you accept patches for features on the roadmap / not on the
> > roadmap
> 
> Both will be accepted if those patches meet the quality I want (is it
> going to be widely used feature? / doesn't it sacrifice stability /
> performance / usability?)

Some of the features we have planned (or need) fit into the "widely used
feature" category (s/mime 3), and some do not (hmtp protocol). We will
have to study sylpheed architecture a bit more to figure out what can be
done as an external plug-in, and what need to be in the main source
tree.

> 
> >  - Is there any form of copyright assignement or something like that
> > for contributions ?
> 
> Currently there is no explicit assignment for contributors. There is
> implicit rules, though:
> 
> - The copyright holder of patch itself is the author.
> - The copyright holder of source files newly written by the patch
>   author is the author.
> - The copyright holder of the modified files in the source tree will be
>   basically kept as is.

Thanks for your input.

Thomas.



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]