[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: sylpheed
Subject: [sylpheed:23360] Re: PATCH: encrypt-to-self
From: Ian Bruce <ian_bruce () fastmail ! fm>
Date: 2004-09-03 15:18:17
Message-ID: 20040903081817.0981945a.ian_bruce () fastmail ! fm
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:34:50 +0900
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y@kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Since nobody replied to this patch, should I assume that it was
> > rejected? Or is this not the proper venue for submitting patches?
>
> Sorry, I haven't had a time to look into your patch.
Understood. I think you will find that it's very short and simple; only
about 50 lines of new code.
> > I'm thinking of writing a patch to make sylpheed understand RFC-3156
> > compliant OpenPGP signatures. Is that likely to be accepted?
>
> Isn't it already implemented? Or do you mention something different?
Please see here:
http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/21996
-- Ian Bruce
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic