[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sylpheed
Subject:    [sylpheed:23360] Re: PATCH: encrypt-to-self
From:       Ian Bruce <ian_bruce () fastmail ! fm>
Date:       2004-09-03 15:18:17
Message-ID: 20040903081817.0981945a.ian_bruce () fastmail ! fm
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:34:50 +0900
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y@kcn.ne.jp> wrote:

> > Since nobody replied to this patch, should I assume that it was
> > rejected? Or is this not the proper venue for submitting patches?
> 
> Sorry, I haven't had a time to look into your patch.

Understood. I think you will find that it's very short and simple; only
about 50 lines of new code.

> > I'm thinking of writing a patch to make sylpheed understand RFC-3156
> > compliant OpenPGP signatures. Is that likely to be accepted?
> 
> Isn't it already implemented? Or do you mention something different?

Please see here:

http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/21996


-- Ian Bruce

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic