[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: sylpheed
Subject: [sylpheed:15678] GPG-Confusion
From: Daniel Lorch <ml-daniel () lorch ! cc>
Date: 2002-08-29 22:32:15
[Download RAW message or body]
hi,
I'm sorry if this has been adressed before, but I'm totally confused about
the ongoing efforts on integrating GPGme into sylpheed. Yes, I read the list
archives and the FAQ, but that even confused me more. My ultimate goal
is to GPG-[sign|encrypt] messages as "text", not as S/MIME ("attachements"),
just as other mail clients (KMail, SecureBat!) do. This looks like (just to
give you an example of what I'm talking about):
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My Message[..]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
asldfhalsdflasdfjasd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
However, while a bunch of people are using the GPG-Patch by Jens, others
believe in their "Actions". But the announcement of 0.8.2 mentions "clear
text signing", which it does not appear to be having - or am I just missing
a switch?
Any help would be appreciated :)
-daniel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic