[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: struts-dev
Subject: Re: Struts-faces
From: Craig McClanahan <craigmcc () apache ! org>
Date: 2004-07-06 2:41:10
Message-ID: 40EA1146.5050107 () apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Michael Rassmussen wrote:
> I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume that faces
> is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt faces against 2.3 and
> the problems seem to have gone away. I haven't tried 2.4, but it
> seems that it should work fine there. It is my guess after trying to
> build struts-faces in eclipse using servlet 2.2 that the problem is
> with 2.2 not being supported. (And it shouldn't be right?)
> Michael
>
>
That's correct ... JSF requires Servlet 2.3.
Note: my nightly build scripts use Ant, not Maven ... and I'm in the
process of cleaning that up. Shortly I'll be posting a list of the
actual dependencies I'm using for the Struts nightly build, which should
correspond to what we actually include in 1.2.1.
Craig
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan
> <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> > Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make sure it stays in \
> > > synch with Tomcat 5.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake. It needs to compile
> > against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as a minimum
> > platform. I'll fix that in tonight's run.
> >
> >
> >
> > > But, the question is whether we want to mandate that Struts-Faces can only \
> > > compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or is there a way to write \
> > > the class so it compiles under either?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > I'll take a look at the changes once I catch up a little bit more, and
> > might be able to come up with something clever that makes this possible
> > (still recovering from JavaOne and ~11k backlogged mail messages :-).
> >
> >
> >
> > > I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with DataSources \
> > > between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the issue here is, but for DataSources, \
> > > the interface changed and we had to stub the new members so that they threw \
> > > exceptions if called. Of course, the problem with that approach is it may \
> > > obviate new functionality or rely on deprecated methods.
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > James,
> > > >
> > > > i also guess it is the result of the commitment.
> > > > i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is,
> > > > the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4
> > > >
> > > > okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate.
> > > >
> > > > i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3
> > > > since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers
> > > >
> > > > So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4
> > > > for compiling.
> > > >
> > > > btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like tomcat5.0)
> > > >
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I think it is happening because of the changes I committed for
> > > > > your fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped,
> > > > > it's right after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue
> > > > > of what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper
> > > > > class is being compiled against. Is it not possible to make that
> > > > > class compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4?
> > > > >
> > > > > -James
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:mailings@matthias-
> > > > > wessendorf.de] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To:
> > > > > dev@struts.apache.org Subject: Struts-faces
> > > > >
> > > > > see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-
> > > > > faces/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the nightly build is empty again,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
> > > > > successful?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Weßendorf
> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > DE-48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > Germany
> > > > > Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net
> > > > > URL: http://www.wessendorf.net
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > > > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > > > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic