[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       squid-dev
Subject:    Re: Rv: Why not BerkeleyDB based object store?
From:       Kinkie <gkinkie () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-11-29 8:29:13
Message-ID: f4ad058f0811290029j67c0910ei6005b04e522ad01f () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Lucas Brasilino
<lucas.brasilino@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kinkie:
>
>> - workload is mostly writes
>>  a well-tuned forward proxy will have a hit-rate of roughly 30%,
>> which means 3 writes for every read on average
>
> I don't know if I've misunderstood this statement.. Are you saying that
> even if an object is uncacheable, Squid stills storing it to disk ?

That was an oversimplification on my part, sorry about that.

-- 
    /kinkie
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]