[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: spamcop.net tactics
From:       "qqqq" <qqqq () usermail ! com>
Date:       2005-11-21 18:14:18
Message-ID: 02f301c5eec7$78b18690$6501a8c0 () globalbfons
[Download RAW message or body]

I am not a fan myself and do not use them.  However, you should have received a mailing to postmaster (or abuse) due to
Spamcop complaints.  Did you get these?

QQQQ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Amos" <a.goo0h@gmail.com>
To: "SpamAssassin" <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:11 AM
Subject: spamcop.net tactics


| I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
| SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
| single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
| if this was a complete authoritarian state. We try hard to control and
| minimize spamming events, but alas, sometimes they happen.
|
| Just recently we discovered we've been tagged by spamcop. Since the
| spamtrap is "secrete", there's no way to know what incident triggered
| this event, which makes it pretty damn difficult to track it down to
| try to deal with it. Furthermore, a site has only one chance to delist
| their server. After that, it's a permanent block.
|
| So, if we can't tell what source is a problem, only have one chance to
| delist--EVER--seems to me we're pretty screwed. Lovely.
|
| Amos
|
|

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]