[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       soap-user
Subject:    RE: Apache SOAP VS Apache AXIS
From:       Anne Thomas Manes <anne () manes ! net>
Date:       2004-02-26 1:19:37
Message-ID: 6.0.1.1.2.20040225201916.0412eae8 () pop ! earthlink ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes. Apache Axis runs on XP.

At 07:47 PM 2/25/2004, you wrote:
>I have a windows XP machine. Would Apache Axis work on windows XP
>environment?
>
>Dibor Secka-Jallow
>Web Developer
>Atlanta Housing Authority
>dibor.seckajallow@atlantahousing.org
>404-817-7370
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@scottnichol.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 1:03 PM
>To: soap-user@ws.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Apache SOAP VS Apache AXIS
>
>If you do not have considerable time invested in this and do not have
>services running in production, I highly recommend you change to Axis
>now.  Apache SOAP is best for people who have already made a significant
>commitment.
>
>You will want to use the 1.1 version of Axis at
>http://ws.apache.org/axis/download.cgi.  The binary distribution is best
>for most users.  The source distribution requires that you build Axis
>yourself.  It is most useful if you are the type of user who wants to
>investigate bugs or make modifications on your own, or if you find the
>API documentation incomplete and want to use the source to fill the
>gaps.
>
>Personally, I started Apache SOAP using both.  The binaries are what I
>deployed, and the source was useful for going beyond the documentation
>to understand what was really happening under the covers.
>
>Scott Nichol
>
>Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
>because it is filtered to accept only mail from
>specific mail lists.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Secka-Jallow, Dibor" <Dibor.SeckaJallow@atlantahousing.org>
>To: <soap-user@ws.apache.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:48 AM
>Subject: RE: Apache SOAP VS Apache AXIS
>
>
>I do have existing Apache soap code  written my notepad.   What should I
>do now?
>
>Dibor Secka-Jallow
>Web Developer
>Atlanta Housing Authority
>dibor.seckajallow@atlantahousing.org
>404-817-7370
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@scottnichol.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:48 AM
>To: soap-user@ws.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Apache SOAP VS Apache AXIS
>
>If you do not have existing Apache SOAP code, you should definitely use
>Axis.  Here are some reasons.
>
>1. The Apache SOAP project has almost no active development, and has not
>had a new release in years.
>
>2. Axis supports more web services specifications and intends to
>implement new ones as they come up.  Right now, the most important of
>the implemented specifications is WSDL 1.1, which is critical to smooth
>interoperability.  It also implements JAX-RPC, meaning other Java
>implementations supporting that spec can be interchanged with it, DIME,
>which makes its attachments interoperable with Microsoft, and HTTP 1.1.
>
>3. As partially covered in point 2, Axis has more extensive
>interoperability with other SOAP implementations.
>
>Scott Nichol
>
>Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
>because it is filtered to accept only mail from
>specific mail lists.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Calicrates Policroniades" <Calicrates.Policroniades@cl.cam.ac.uk>
>To: <soap-user@ws.apache.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:54 AM
>Subject: Apache SOAP VS Apache AXIS
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm at the beginning of a software project in which I'm planning to
>include
>support for SOAP messages in an application with intensive typed data
>interchange. I've been reading the FAQs and documentation available and
>all of
>them seem to be quiet sympathetic with apache soap's follow-on project
>Apache
>AXIS. I understand the why of this in general terms, but I was wondering
>if
>someone with more experience than me (I'm a newbie to be honest) can
>still
>find advantages in using apache SOAP and not axis.
>
>Thanks,
>Cali

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anne Thomas Manes
VP & Research Director
Burton Group 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]