Search: 
[] List [] Subjects [] Authors [] Bodies for list 'sip-implementors'
Set Page Width: [ 80 ] [ 90 ] [ 100 ] [ 120 ]
Viewing messages in list sip-implementors
- 2010-05-01 - 2010-06-01 (238 messages)
- 2010-04-01 - 2010-05-01 (159 messages)
- 2010-03-01 - 2010-04-01 (274 messages)
 Next  Last 

  1. 2010-04-30  [2] [Sip-implementors] DTMF Negotiation                   sip-imple Dale
  2. 2010-04-29  [3] [Sip-implementors] How to resolve 491 request pending sip-imple sunilkumar.ve
  3. 2010-04-29  [1] [Sip-implementors] RFC 5876 on Updates to Asserted Id sip-imple Volkan Hatem 
  4. 2010-04-29  [5] [Sip-implementors] re-INVITE ACK clarification        sip-imple neil corcoran
  5. 2010-04-28  [1] [Sip-implementors] Registration for SIPit26 closes in sip-imple Robert Sparks
  6. 2010-04-28  [1] [Sip-implementors] Just want to say a hello!          sip-imple Ruslan R. Lai
  7. 2010-04-27  [3] [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER --MD5                 sip-imple Dale
  8. 2010-04-26  [6] [Sip-implementors] SIP mid-dialog requests when TCP c sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
  9. 2010-04-26  [5] [Sip-implementors] Question regarding offer-answer ha sip-imple Paul Kyzivat 
 10. 2010-04-26  [4] [Sip-implementors] Should setting the transport param sip-imple Brett Tate 
 11. 2010-04-26  [1] [Sip-implementors] Fw:  contact header scheme         sip-imple chozhan A 
 12. 2010-04-25  [6] [Sip-implementors] Must the "Branch" parameter in an  sip-imple Alejandro Rec
 13. 2010-04-24  [4] [Sip-implementors] UPDATE Section 5.2 of RFC 3311     sip-imple Pranab Bohra 
 14. 2010-04-23  [2] Re: [Sip-implementors] Fw: Sent-by importance in regi sip-imple Brett Tate 
 15. 2010-04-23  [1] [Sip-implementors] Fw:  Sent-by importance in registr sip-imple Satyakumar 
 16. 2010-04-23  [2] [Sip-implementors] Sent-by importance in registrar bi sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
 17. 2010-04-22  [2] [Sip-implementors] 488 Not acceptable in Fax call     sip-imple Brett Tate 
 18. 2010-04-22  [5] [Sip-implementors] Hi..SIP implementors..             sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
 19. 2010-04-22  [7] [Sip-implementors] contact header scheme              sip-imple chozhan A 
 20. 2010-04-21  [1] Re: [Sip-implementors] Content-type charset parameter sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca
 21. 2010-04-21 [11] [Sip-implementors] Please Help With that ACK          sip-imple Nahum Nir 
 22. 2010-04-21  [1] [Sip-implementors]  Content-type charset parameter    sip-imple Jin-Soo Eo 
 23. 2010-04-21  [2] [Sip-implementors] Query on rfc3312                   sip-imple Avasarala Ran
 24. 2010-04-20  [1] [Sip-implementors] Registration closes in 10 days (wa sip-imple Robert Sparks
 25. 2010-04-20  [1] [Sip-implementors] UA configuration                   sip-imple chozhan A 
 26. 2010-04-20  [6] [Sip-implementors] transport param in uri with sips s sip-imple chozhan A 
 27. 2010-04-20  [5] [Sip-implementors] What is wrong with that regisster  sip-imple Nahum Nir 
 28. 2010-04-20  [1] [Sip-implementors] RTCP Summary - How 'DialogID' head sip-imple hanifa.mohamm
 29. 2010-04-19  [1] [Sip-implementors] Please Help With REGISTER          sip-imple Nahum Nir 
 30. 2010-04-19  [2] [Sip-implementors] RTCP Summary - How DialogID field  sip-imple Iñaki_Baz_Ca

 Next  Last 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic