[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       samba-ntdom
Subject:    Re: NT/SAMBA/2k/NIS
From:       Pat <slu () firerun ! net>
Date:       2000-12-29 18:12:33
[Download RAW message or body]

If you are going to use samba as the PDC and have Win2k clients you will
need to use samba 2.2  since 2.0.7  does not have the capability of
having a Win2k clients become a member of the domain.

As far as the NIS/smbpasswd I don't think there is a way around keeping
multiple password files.  You could have your users run a script at the
command prompt that changes the password in passwd then smbpasswd, and
have the NIS password database rebuild say every 5 min.   Just my 2
cents.

Patrick

Brent DiNicola wrote:

> I have read through the various archives and threads
> and don't see anything that might answer this. I am
> hoping to get some input from a people out there who
> might have dealt with this in the past. Here goes..
>
> We have currently setup:
> Samba as Workgroup (NO DOMAIN)with NIS serving the passwords
> and using plaintext windows passwords. (ie. no smbpassword to
> keep syncronized etc.)
>
> What I need to know is..I want to add a few things to
> this to change the configuration about.
>
> 1. Use of encrypted passwords (DOMAIN should do this)
> 2. Use of NIS should continue to authenticate all users
>    on linux/solaris unix boxes that are the main meat of
>    the servers here, if not I need another way to allow the
>    logins to the unix boxes and be synced with DOMAIN
>    logins without having to maintain multiple password files.
>    (passwd/NIS/smbpasswd)
> 3. Possible that we might need Exchange here, this means
>    either Win2k or NT4 to run exchange on. Do I create a
>    PDC with Samba or do I create it with NT/Win2K?
>    We have no PDC at this time so either would work, it's
>    just a question of which would be easier.
>
> Any help would be appreciated in this area, I would prefer to
> use the older more stable samba rather than TNG just for the
> stability of the samba.
>
> Ideas??
>
> Brent

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]