[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch
From:       "Jason Voegele" <jason () jvoegele ! com>
Date:       2004-10-08 19:17:13
Message-ID: 35232.216.196.200.196.1097263028.squirrel () std5 ! imagineis ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Markus said:
> On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:44, gabriele renzi wrote:
>> I like the idea of free form operators and actually I'd like even
>> prefix  freeform ops, if this patch allow them :)
>
> Not yet.  I can see how to do it, but haven't quite finished thinking
> through the details.  I'd also like to have some way to control the
> precedence/associativity/arity, but I haven't figured out a way to do it
> that I'm sure could be made consistent.

FYI, Eiffel has user-defined prefix and infix operators.  The language
rule is that all user-defined operators have a higher precedence than
built-in operators.  The built-in operators follow typical precedence
rules.

-- 
Jason Voegele
"There is an essential core at the center of each man and woman that
remains unaltered no matter how life's externals may be transformed
or recombined. But it's smaller than we think."
    -- Gene Wolfe, The Book of the Long Sun




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]