[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: Fox --> GTK  ?
From:       Gawnsoft <xlucid () users ! sourceforge ! remove ! this ! antispam ! net>
Date:       2004-04-21 10:09:07
Message-ID: nshc8097jhsja195ddvgh952fpodvjf1uh () 4ax ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:08:46 +0900, Lothar Scholz
<mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote (more or less):

>Hello Hal,
>
>Tuesday, April 20, 2004, 10:20:33 AM, you wrote:
>
>HF> To be fair, I do find Fox rich and powerful, and it's probably just
>HF> my ignorance getting in the way. But I did reach the point where I
>HF> said: No more.
>
>Don't know if this helps you but maybe you want to look at my just
>released Arachno Ruby IDE, it allows you to debug FOX apps (in fact
>your Tycho) was one the first apps where i tested the debugger.
>
>And if you don't like this. Maybe you want have a look at FLTK. The
>included Ruby Distribution (1.8.1 based) comes with a ready to use FLTK
>extension.
>
>URL is:  http://www.ruby-ide.com
>
>By the way the IDE is written in FOX. So you can see that FOX is
>indeed rich and powerful, but i also saw that it didn't fit into my way of
>doing things (create, target system, shortcut keys etc.) so i spend the
>first months on writing an abstraction layer.

Perhaps it'd be wporth publishing the (Fox-specific?) abstraction
layer?



Cheers, 
   Euan
Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki:  http://html.dnsalias.net:1122
Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk)  http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]