[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta-devel
Subject:    Re: [quanta-devel] KDOM & KHTML
From:       Frans Englich <frans.englich () telia ! com>
Date:       2006-03-05 16:44:01
Message-ID: 200603051644.01961.frans.englich () telia ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 05 March 2006 16:27, Andras Mantia wrote:
> HI,
>
>  Please take a little time and read the following thread
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kfm-devel&m=114099614807147&w=2
>
> Am I the only one understanding that this compromises our plans by
> having only one (KDOM) tree for source and VPL modes?

My advice to you is to lobby. If you need KDOM to be designed in a certain way 
and have certain features, then lobby on kfm-devel and make absolute clear 
that everyone knows what is important to you. That's how you affect the 
outcome.

I'm all for that we have generic XML code in kdelibs that can be used 
arbitrarily by applications, not only khtml.


Cheers,

		Frans
_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]