[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta-devel
Subject:    [quanta-devel] Re: Subversion repository structure (was:
From:       Alexander Dymo <adymo () mksat ! net>
Date:       2005-02-20 21:57:29
Message-ID: 200502202357.29652.adymo () mksat ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 20 February 2005 11:04, Andras Mantia wrote:
> I'd like to keep it under tunk/KDE. This is because kdewebdev has other
> (standalone) applications, like the HTML image map editor, the XSL
> debugger or the link checker. I'm not including KFileReplace and
> Kommander here as they are not completely related to web
> development. ;-)

Posting this in another mail just to highlight the issue of complimentary
development apps.
I'd like to explain the situation of KDevelop.
We have three types of dependencies:
1) mandatory: kdelibs
2) must have: svn kioslave, cvsservice from kdesdk
3) good to have: kcachegrind from kdesdk, valgrind, etc.

IMHO Quanta has the same three types of dependencies:
1) kdelibs
2) kommander, kfilereplace, cvsservice?
3) whatever???

So I'd like to have applications with dependency type of 2) to be
placed in kdevplatform module as well as libraries and common plugins.
What do you think?

-- 
Alexander Dymo
ICST Department, National University of Shipbuilding, Mykolayiv, Ukraine
_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]