[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta
Subject:    Re: [Quanta] Directory Mapping dialog EVERY time I debug after
From:       Kimberly Lazarski <kim () biyn ! com>
Date:       2005-04-04 17:18:54
Message-ID: 1112635134.13390.93.camel () kim2p3lin ! biyn ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:29, Linus McCabe wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2005 17.42, Kimberly Lazarski wrote:
> > I run it from the Suse distribution. Suse 9.1, upgraded from KDE 3.2.x
> > to 3.3.2 and now to 3.4 using YaST, from Suse's RPMs on Suse's FTP site
> > (the supplementary tree).
> 
> Ok, I've committed a fix to the 3.4 CVS branch and HEAD, but of course, it 
> will take some time until there are new packages made...
> 
> If you have the option of trying the 3.4 CVS version, please go ahead!

Where is it located now? The sourceforge project appears to be out of
date (3.3.2 / December 10, 2004), at least based on the posted releases.
If I get the source with CVS will I be able to get the current labels? 

> 
> For local projects, you need to set both local and server basedirs to / in 
> project settings to indicate you're using a local project where no mapping is 
> required (after the fix).
> 
> > I am running your very latest Gubed release and have tried the older
> > version as well. I didn't think it would have any impact on either issue
> > but I wanted to rule it out.
> 
> When using Quanta, there are always special packages of Gubed to use, since 
> Quanta releases are never in sync with Gubed releases...
> 
> They can be found here:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=75605&package_id=122443
> 

The one I am running is GubedQuanta3_4.tar.gz

The alternate I tried is the one I was running with 3.3.2:
GubedQuantaCVS20050131.tar.gz


> > > If I'm lucky I can find a 'trace' or equivalent string some place.
> 
> I wasnt, and perhaps it's better to wait for next Quanta release anyway, to 
> avoid even further confusion...
> 
> Anyway, I'm still not sure the current mapping mechanism is optimal, but it 
> should work better after the fix.

I'll try it out as soon as I can obtain the source and compile.  Thanks
Linus!

--Kim

> 
> /Linus
-- 
No virus found in this email - I run Linux. ;)
_______________________________________________
Quanta mailing list
Quanta@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]