[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quagga-users
Subject:    [quagga-users 11766] Re: Static Linux Default Route with a	Lower
From:       lsorense () csclub ! uwaterloo ! ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Date:       2010-09-02 20:47:07
Message-ID: 20100902204707.GK2632 () caffeine ! csclub ! uwaterloo ! ca
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:49:13PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> Yes, but when you have been using *NIX since the mid '80s you get
> set in your ways ;)

Well I only started in the early 90s, so perhaps I am more flexible. :)

I certainly apprieciate:

ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 1.2.3.4

compared to:

route add -net 0.0.0.0 nm 0.0.0.0 gw 1.2.3.4

The ip route syntax matches with modern classless subnets much better
than the old netmasks did.  And the ip route shows the routes in the
same syntax used to add and remove, route did not.  Completely different.

-- 
Len Sorensen
_______________________________________________
Quagga-users mailing list
Quagga-users@lists.quagga.net
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]