[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postfix-users
Subject: Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?
From: micah anderson <micah () riseup ! net>
Date: 2020-05-25 15:28:45
Message-ID: 87tv04uj82.fsf () protozoa ! riseup ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Kris Deugau <kdeugau@vianet.ca> writes:
> micah anderson wrote:
>> Allen Coates <znabble@cidercounty.org.uk> writes:
>>> The web page https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html (about half-way down the page)
>>> has an honest - and fairly recent - appraisal of a number of DNSBLs.
>>
>> Its a little outdated...
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> Invaluement DNSBL
>> [Note: Commercial] ivmURI and ivmSIP are good solid and
>> professionally operated lists. ivmURI is a URI (domain) DNSBL like
>> SURBL or URIBL or DBL, with high effectiveness (comparable with
>> DBL/URIBL/SURBL), extremely low false positives, and quick to
>> list. ivmSIP is a IP-based DNSBL which is particularly good at
>> catching "new" emitters. Its FP rate is quite low. Neither of which
>> should be considered substitutes for Spamhaus Zen/Spamcop, but do
>> complement them well.
>>
>> They no longer exist.
>
> Not sure where you're looking, but we have an active subscription for
> Invaluement and the datafeed files all have timestamps within the last
> ~10 minutes or so.
>
> https://www.invaluement.com/
ah, the link on https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html goes to:
https://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ which is not a valid site.
--
micah
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic