[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postfix-users
Subject:    Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?
From:       micah anderson <micah () riseup ! net>
Date:       2020-05-25 15:28:45
Message-ID: 87tv04uj82.fsf () protozoa ! riseup ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Kris Deugau <kdeugau@vianet.ca> writes:

> micah anderson wrote:
>> Allen Coates <znabble@cidercounty.org.uk> writes:
>>> The web page https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html  (about half-way down the page)
>>> has an honest - and fairly recent - appraisal of a number of DNSBLs.
>> 
>> Its a little outdated...
>> 
>> For example:
>> 
>> Invaluement DNSBL
>>      [Note: Commercial] ivmURI and ivmSIP are good solid and
>>      professionally operated lists. ivmURI is a URI (domain) DNSBL like
>>      SURBL or URIBL or DBL, with high effectiveness (comparable with
>>      DBL/URIBL/SURBL), extremely low false positives, and quick to
>>      list. ivmSIP is a IP-based DNSBL which is particularly good at
>>      catching "new" emitters. Its FP rate is quite low. Neither of which
>>      should be considered substitutes for Spamhaus Zen/Spamcop, but do
>>      complement them well.
>> 
>> They no longer exist.
>
> Not sure where you're looking, but we have an active subscription for 
> Invaluement and the datafeed files all have timestamps within the last 
> ~10 minutes or so.
>
> https://www.invaluement.com/

ah, the link on https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html goes to:
https://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ which is not a valid site.

-- 
        micah
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic