[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssl-dev
Subject:    Re: [openssl-dev] Test coverage report + small patch
From:       Andrejs Igumenovs <andrejs.igumenovs () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-04-30 16:41:23
Message-ID: 16221C5E-F585-47F7-ADA0-6B6E6E6052A3 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Harri,

This looks helpful for those writing unit tests.

It would be cool to have a similar thing for the unit test coverage.

(https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Unit_Testing)

- Andrejs

> On 30.04.2015, at 17:50, Harri Porten <porten@froglogic.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> In case you are interested in seeing the condition/decision source code coverage as \
> achieved through the OpenSSL test suite: 
> http://www.opencoverage.net/projects/openssl/index_html/sources.html
> 
> We now regularly generate the reports from the tip of the master branch. In the \
> hope that it'll be useful for those touching and wanting to know how well it is \
> tested. 
> Condition/decision coverage uncovers test combinations normally hidden in line or \
> statement coverage. Hence the much lower result of 29.6%. A long way to go still :} \
>  Please let us know if you notice that we should extend the build or test \
> configuration to enable or run more components of the code. 
> Some of the dead code findings may be harmless. Still, changes like the attached \
> one for b_sock.c will fix cases like \
> http://www.opencoverage.net/projects/openssl/index_html/source_565.html#line688 and \
> make the code more understandable at the same time. Maybe it's even an unwanted \
> leftover? 
> Harri.
> <b_sock.diff>_______________________________________________
> openssl-dev mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]