[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openpkg-dev
Subject:    Re: FSL not optimal?
From:       Thomas Lotterer <thl () dev ! de ! cw ! com>
Date:       2003-06-24 13:32:28
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003, Thomas Lotterer wrote:

> [...] We understand that some people prefer to have a global system level
> logging and want to stick with the native syslog(3) facility.
> 
>     So we decided to make fsl optional in the future
>     with default to use fsl.
> 
> The packages will only be modified to omit fsl build and run-time
> requirements and remove fsl from the linker stage.
> 
fsl is now optional with default yes, as promised [1]

> The predefined fsl
> configuration files and rc scripts will still be installed and cron will
> run the scripts to trim log files which stay empty forever. Some logfile
> analysis tools inside OpenPKG may fail with empty or not existent logs.
> The global syslog(3) must be configured separately and system logs will
> require manual trimming ...
> 
keep this is mind!

The rc files, especially the (somtimes previously missing) parts
regarding log file trimming, were unified, too [2]



[1] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9922
    http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9923
    http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9924
    http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9925

[2] http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9934
    http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9935
    http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=9937

--
Thomas.Lotterer@cw.com
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe, Cable & Wireless
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List                   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]