[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-hotspot-runtime-dev
Subject:    RE: RFR(XXS): 8171960: Event-based tracing needs separate flag representation for Method
From:       Markus Gronlund <markus.gronlund () oracle ! com>
Date:       2016-12-23 13:51:10
Message-ID: ffe6055f-9c88-482d-b81c-89e80fac7986 () default
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks George!

Markus

-----Original Message-----
From: George Triantafillou 
Sent: den 23 december 2016 14:24
To: hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(XXS): 8171960: Event-based tracing needs separate flag representation for Method

+1

-George

On 12/23/2016 8:22 AM, harold seigel wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> The changes look good.
>
> Thanks, Harold
>
>
> On 12/23/2016 6:29 AM, Markus Gronlund wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>>
>> Kindly asking for reviews for the following fix:
>>
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171960
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgronlun/8171960/webrev01/
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>>
>> In order to fix a closed confidential bug, I would need to separate 
>> the flag representation that is currently being used by the 
>> Event-based tracing framework for Method.
>>
>>
>> The separate flag representation will be non-existent by default; it 
>> will only materialize under the conjunction (INCLUDE_TRACE AND 
>> implementation available).
>>
>> The existing bit will be removed from the Flags enum with the 
>> associated accessors.
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]