[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-2d-dev
Subject:    Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <AWT Dev> JDK-8041679 Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder within th
From:       Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz () oracle ! com>
Date:       2014-05-20 6:45:05
Message-ID: 68F1F3CD-502A-4CBC-ABD6-7B1A24F9D3D8 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On May 19, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Phil Race <philip.race@oracle.com> wrote:

> On 5/19/2014 12:50 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > On 19/05/2014 07:53, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> > > If i don't have permission to push to the client repo (which might be likely) i \
> > > will need to hand over the patch to yourself or Sergey to commit. And i presume \
> > > this will have to be a separate issue.
> > If you do decide to split this then it will require creating a second issue JIRA \
> > to avoid running foul of jcheck when jdk/client eventually pushes to jdk/dev. I \
> > don't know how often jdk9/client integrates into jdk9/dev but it doesn't seem to \
> > be very frequent (hg incoming suggests there is currently about a month of \
> > changes backed up in jdk9/client but there may be issues to explain this). 
> > For this specific case then it doesn't seem worth it, it would be much less \
> > effort to just push the lot to jdk9/dev. Clearly if there were substantive \
> > changes then it would be important to push the changes to the forest where they \
> > are most likely to get tested but it hardly seems worth it here. From what I can \
> > tell then Phil or others sync up jdk9/client regularly and that might be the most \
> > efficient way to get these changes into jdk9/client. 
> The changes should go through client for the reasons I already gave.

IIUC these were the reasons you gave in a previous email on this thread:

"I would not push hotspot changes to client either. Also lots of files
are being updated in client and doing it this way will minimise merges ..."

I don't find either very convincing.


> No new permissions are needed but it will need a unique bug id.
> 

Ok.


> FWIW integrations are intended to be bi-weekly but holidays interfered this time.
> 

Why does it take so long?

Paul.


["signature.asc" (signature.asc)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=58WC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]