[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openembedded-core
Subject: Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Y2038 proposal
From: "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie () linuxfoundation ! org>
Date: 2022-11-30 16:59:28
Message-ID: f63f222e6c7bd50f1b50ffb198c61864a67f9ef2.camel () linuxfoundation ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 17:56 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 30/11/2022 16:46:17+0000, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On 30 Nov 2022, at 14:20, Richard Purdie via lists.yoctoproject.org \
> > <richard.purdie=linuxfoundation.org@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > * Could we optionally disable some of the glibc 32 bit function calls
> > > > > to ensure they're not being used?
> > > >
> > > > Could you be more specific here? Would you like to disable some
> > > > syscalls?
> > >
> > > I'm meaning disabling the 32 bit glibc time functions.
> >
> > Some time ago I filed
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6803 as Debian
> > has a nice sanity check where it warns if non-LFS glibc functions
> > are used. I imagine the same logic could be used to check for 32-
> > bit time_t use.
That sounds interesting and something we should probably look into for
both issues...
> >
>
> We can simply disable COMPAT_32BIT_TIME in the kernel config.
That would cause runtime issues but not build time linking ones?
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#174027): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/174027
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95361986/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic