[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openembedded-core
Subject:    Re: [OE-core][dunfell 00/14] Pull request (cover letter only)
From:       "Steve Sakoman" <steve () sakoman ! com>
Date:       2020-10-30 14:45:37
Message-ID: CAOSpxdY5ZvBJJFAKBxW=0Dh10ePLZt4gTKsu0Hym0qzfB23rdg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks Martin!  I really appreciate the help in testing.

Steve

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:41 AM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 03:31:25PM +0100, Martin Jansa via lists.openembedded.org \
> wrote:
> > The script just finished, I've uploaded the results here:
> > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca
> >  
> > There is a lot of changes compared to master, but mostly because I didn't
> > have ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET set to thumb in this run.
> > 
> > That helped to reveal one issue in
> > meta/conf/machine/include/tune-arm9tdmi.inc
> > which most likely exists in master as well (wasn't detected before just
> > because ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET).
> > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/diff/scripts/tune/log.fake- \
> > arm9tdmi.arm9tdmi?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca
> >  
> > And the meta/conf/machine/include/tune-supersparc.inc is failing like it
> > did in master before removal in:
> > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=861519337b6e5e986c3c4b8ba253e8339caf0805
> >  which you probably intentionally didn't backport to dunfell.
> > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/diff/scripts/tune/log.fake-supersparc?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c87f58e4235fc5c2fe31037917fd999bf4142dca
> >  
> > I'll trigger it once more with thumb enabled to better show what's the
> > difference from master.
> 
> test with thumb enabled finished and looks OK
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=jansa/tune-test-dunfell&id=c8a0a19b8585661c39e1ba7e16d061d0ae2afc74
>  
> There is a lot of changes compared to results from master, but those are
> expected.
> 
> The arm9tdmi issue I mentioned before is reproducible in master as well,
> I've sent fix for master:
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/144002
> it could be backported later.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:34 PM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Steve,
> > > 
> > > it's from this branch:
> > > 
> > > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/tune-test
> > > 
> > > I've already started it on top of dunfell with these fixes backported,
> > > will report back when it's finished (will take at least rest of today to
> > > finish).
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:03 PM Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:24 PM Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Did you run tune/test.sh script with these on dunfell or do you want me
> > > > to?
> > > > 
> > > > No, I didn't.  I'm not familiar with that script.  Can you point me in
> > > > the right direction?
> > > > 
> > > > > It looks OK, but would be good to confirm that it fixes all issues
> > > > > currently in dunfell.
> > > > 
> > > > Agreed!
> > > > 
> > > > Steve
> > > > 
> > > 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#144006): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/144006
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/77830120/4454766
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [openembedded-core@marc.info]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]