[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: netatalk
Subject: Routing issue with atalkd
From: Patrik Schindler <poc () pocnet ! net>
Date: 2000-05-31 22:53:24
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello,
since the elder days of the original 1.4b code I saw an issue which I could not \
explain.
Take two linux-2.2.15-glibc-2.1.2 hosts. Install and run atalkd on both machines, \
which both have two network interfaces. Every machine has one connection to the \
other. This connection is a modem link (with vtun). I don't think, this is an issow, \
because I had a similar setup 2 years ago with stock 1.4b2 via pure ethernet and the \
same problems. The free network interface is connected to a Mac (OS 7.6.1/w OT 1.3 \
and stock OS 8.1 respectively). One side has also a 2nd linux-box running.
Nbplkup shows both linux machines (afpd) very fine. But one mac can't see the other.
I looked into /proc/atalk_iface and /proc/atalk_route and saw that the routes get set \
okay as expected. I also nbplkup'ed a bit and aechoed remote machines: Works \
perfectly.
Name propagation seems to be reliable only locally:
This is the view on the remote side. You see 17.124 (Mac/8.1).
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
Mc: Power Macintosh 17.124:251
Mc:Workstation 17.124:4
This is the local view.
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
And this is the local view from the 2nd box.
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
I could verify this behaviour with trawl from the local Mac: No Mc on the other side.
Has anyone verified this behaviour befor or am I the only one which has such a "big" \
network? :-)
> wq! PoC
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic