[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       nepomuk
Subject:    Re: [Nepomuk] Activities and desktop events - Results from the
From:       Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-29 9:10:52
Message-ID: AANLkTi=PBPL8UOWHd1ZsgmkkkKnHNJYZZNuSTA+f9oZT () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> select (s1*s2) as score where { ?r nao:score ?s1 . ?r nao:score2 ?s2 . }
>
> What do you think of that? It is a bit hacky but should make the process
> much faster again.

It is ok. One question though, can we do this:

select (s1 * exp(d) * s2 as score ...)

That is, do virtuoso support exp?

If yes, we will not need to constantly update the score.

>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> On 07/28/2010 06:52 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>> Here's the proposal for the new scoring formula.
>>
>> If you are not able to read .tex or .dvi, you can get the .pdf from here:
>> http://poincare.math.rs/~ivan/files/other/scoring.pdf
>>
>> ---
>> Not related to the above part:
>>
>> We need unique rating for every activity. Any ideas about how to do
>> that in a simple way?
>>
>>
>> Cheerio,
>> Ivan
>>
>> --
>> While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
>> Dying to believe in what you heard
>> I was staring straight into the shining sun
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> Nepomuk@kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>



-- 
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]