[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mandrake-cooker
Subject:    Re: [Cooker] Critical bug, but no response!!
From:       Lea Gris <lea.gris () noiraude ! net>
Date:       2003-05-05 15:08:09
[Download RAW message or body]

Buchan Milne wrote:

> I've lost it now, but there was an easy summary of bugs by maintainer,
> and "kde" or lmontel was quite high up there.
> 
> In the mean time, a search like this is informative:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&pr \
> oduct=kdebase&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssub \
> str&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_stat \
> us=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=s \
> ubstring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substrin \
> g&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chf \
> ieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
>  
> I think you and Warly need to come to some agreement on permissible bug
> levels for a release, otherwise you're going to end up having too many
> bugfix updates to do. Ideally, that would include having any "critical"
> bugs ...

Whou decides on what bug to fix first at Mandrakesoft ?

Despite the voting system how does this all thing get managed ?

Regards

-- 
      Léa Gris - http://www.noiraude.net/
()   Campagne du ruban texte brut contre les courriels en HTML,
/\   contre les pièces jointes Microsoft.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]