[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       mageia-discuss
Subject:    Re: [Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?
From:       Adjamilton_Medeiros_de_Almeida_Júnior
Date:       2010-09-26 21:51:22
Message-ID: AANLkTin_4aWyK0=GdSWqoJyck=3fOjhnXYu25HOte=== () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think that the first release of Magia have that be like Madriva.
Modifications can be implemented in future releases.

Adjamilton J=FAnior

2010/9/26 Kristoffer Grundstr=F6m <kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com>

>  Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if possible)?
>
> .mageia ?
>
> Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM<ravikumar17ja=
n@gmail.com> <ravikumar17jan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
> i prefer apt and deb personally
>
>
>   I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
> deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
> benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
> urpmi?
>
> >From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
> the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
> I don't believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
> significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
> devs and  creating a new build system.
>
>
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

I think that the first release of Magia have that be like Madriva. Modifications can \
be implemented in future releases.<div><br></div><div>Adjamilton Júnior<br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">2010/9/26 Kristoffer Grundström <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com">kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
 <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex;">

  
    
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if
    possible)?<br>
    <br>
    .mageia ?<br>
    <br>
    Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
    <div><div></div><div class="h5"><blockquote type="cite">
      <pre>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM
<a href="mailto:ravikumar17jan@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">&lt;ravikumar17jan@gmail.com&gt;</a> wrote: </pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre>only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
i prefer apt and deb personally

</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
urpmi?

&gt;From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
I don&#39;t believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
devs and  creating a new build system.

</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]