[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-user
Subject:    Re: QueryParser refactoring
From:       Daniel Naber <daniel.naber () t-online ! de>
Date:       2005-03-08 14:08:00
Message-ID: 200503081508.00541.daniel.naber () t-online ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 08 March 2005 14:46, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> > Right. `a AND (NOT b)'  parses to `a'
>
> Is this what we want to happen for a general purpose next generation
> Lucene QueryParser though?  I'm not sure.  Perhaps this should be a
> ParseException instead?

As we have no concept of a "warning" we should indeed prefer to throw an 
exception instead of silently modifying the query in ways the users don't 
expect.

Regards
 Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]