[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lucene-dev
Subject:    Re: BitSet implementation and large index
From:       Daniel Naber <daniel.naber () t-online ! de>
Date:       2005-02-14 19:07:11
Message-ID: 200502142007.11652 () danielnaber ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 14 February 2005 16:29, tony@simpleobjects.com wrote:

> It seems that for a huge index, it might be a good idea to use a
> different implementation of the BitSet when doing filtering (assuming
> the non-filtered set is relatively small).   This would really help
> minimize the memory required for each filter operation.

This already exists:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]